of The Holy Bible, is the ONLY  totally  uncontested version having Royal Ascent and in-context, Godly Prophet Approval, , and at that time in 1611, King James required The Bible version of his sponsorship and distribution, contain only and none  other than context from the ancient scrolls and parchments that either were self-confirming or were confirmable by axiom, or by the comparison support of other scrolls, parchments, clay tablets, etc., and also because the original William Tyndale translations that it's composed from, are and remain  the only historically confirmed English versions that were translated directly from the Hebrew and Greek sources, and, with such repeatedly confirmed meticulousness of accuracy throughout the entirety of Mr.William Tyndale's translation work, that as is confirmed herein following, it could not have been the accomplishment of a human appointee or even a group of mere human scholars, because similarly as in the anointing of such as Abel, Enoch, Noah, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Joshua, Othniel, Ehud, Deborah, Gideon, Jotham, Tola, Jair, Jephthah, Samson, Phinehas, Samuel, David, Nathan, Elijah, Elisha, Micaiah, Daniel, etc., where only ONE man received the specific appointment, similarly, it's BLATANTLY obvious WHY The AuKJV retains globally preferred BIBLE EDITION STATUS of Scientifically Confirmed Historical* documents that contain creation source information that pre-dates Eden, and as a result, except  for The UN-published OCV version* used on this website, The AuKJV is the only  version that is worthy of the title, "Holy Bible", because,  except for The  OCV  version* quoted on this website, nun uther version uv The Holy Bible is az comprehensively correct and without thu many omishunz, abridgements, and uther malignments, -AND- many so-called biblez having MORE than eight THOUZAND changez* that the Authorized King James Version is free of, in addition to the simple fact that it's totally IM-possible for there to be MORE than ONE ORIGINAL, Providentially inspired HOLY Bible, and that obvious and UN-contestable reality confirming all uthers require thu SAME example recorded in Acts 19:19, to negate any possibility of remaining eligible for thu judgement of Rev.22:18-19, because having any such, confirms acseptance thereof, and because acceptance confirms condonement, it renderz thoze in pozeshun, equally az guilty az thu perpetratorz. Prophecy HINT: If this blatantly factual information doesn't result in you feeling spiritually shaken and desirous of quickly disposing of all profane bible editions before sundown, , it's because you're NOT a sheep of Messiah's Flock, nor potentially, because all of they KNOW their Shepherd's Voice and without hesitation, OBEY it. The UN-changing God of Mal.3:6, reveals in 2:5 that He has respect for none other than they that FEAR His abhorrence of evil. John 10:27 AuKJV Also, by rejecting OLD Testament Judgements, you're rejecting NEW Testament Blessings, because they both have The Same, Un-changing Author. 

        The imperatively essential ingredient of correct perspective of cognizance in comprehending the intended significance of The "HOLY" prefix in thu title uv Thu Book that iz Thu Holy Bible, AND the AuKJV being The only one such, THAT ingredient is the understanding that The AuKJV HAZ such title, NOT because all ingredients therein are Holy, BUT because its composition ingredients are the result of The Holy Spirit's choice of the context thereof, 2Tim.3:16, for the accomplishing of His purpose and understandably, The HOLY Spirit entity compiled a record of such choosing as reveals His purpose for this realm of things, NOT because the first murderer in Genesis was a Holy person, nor the defecting of a major apostle an Holy occurrence, nor that of King Solomon constituting the least of an Holy manner of conduct as pertains to his closing years of trial and testing pilgrimage, , because NUN such records reveal HOLYness, BUT because of the personal example benefit these and other such and even entirely opposing records provide for the aspiring Disciple Of Messiah, by having direct access to factual, case histories of specific persons whose prior pilgrimage record to that of ours, portrays vivid detail that in every instance, can be beneficially gleaned-from, in stark contrast with the simplistic results of comparison when reckoning into each such account conjunctively, our Maker's never changing, perpetually sustained definition of Holyness.

        Thus, it's no surprise that satan has proven so superbly diligent and Bible statistics confirmed successful at persuading thu majority since Eden, of thu falsehood that God abolished Thu Foundational Basis of all Bible confirmed Holyness, and to know this reality of an absolute certainty yourself, prior to searching out any other Bible Source information, you =OWE= it to yourself, to be factually informed and absolutely aware thus, of The Source Reality of all Holyness, seeing as that is the first word in The Title of The Book you're researching by reading these pages.

        Note therefore, Num.15:40, wherein yor very Maker sez, , ,

 Exserpts  frum My King James Bible, Sorse Reserch



        A prominently major record of professional opinion of King James, is that of Mr. Abbot, the then Lord Mayor of London, , whom stated that King James’ reputation was so flawlessly and immaculately UN-spotted, that even malice itself wouldn't find actual blemish in it, and thus, that in reputational fact, King James’ intelligence, virtue, wisdom and wit, , was comparable to that of King David, Josiah, Moses, and Hezekiah, and probably only one bible scholar in a million, is aware that King James monarchy record includes professionally delivered governmental sermons, such as that on record as having occurred in The Star Chamber, June 20, 1616, when officially providing openly discoursed meditation on Mat.27:27-29.
 
     King James disliked the Geneva Bible because of the blatant obviety that in fact, it was merely an encyclopaedia of Calvinist perception and ideology, , and he despised the so-called  Bishop's Bible because of it being so thoroughly intruded with pre-conceived marginal notations, its text too  often containing Latinisms and incomprehensible phrases, such as, "Lay thy bread upon wet faces.", instead of, "Cast thy bread upon the waters.", , and additionally was deemed pompous and obscure, , instead of instilling reverence and respect, , and thus, its many proclivities were not Royally desired in the King James Version.
 
          Under the title, The Rules To Be Observed In Translation, , as contained within the sixteen distinctly separate instructions as listed on two sheets of paper, The Cambridge University Library historical record of this event, reveals King James' inherent potential for efficiency in all respective administrative matters, by his sole, un-discussed requirement of six translation groups, each consisting of a director and eight translators, as was dictated through his assistant, Mr. Richard Bancroft, and each translator to be commendably efficient in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic.
 
     One of a few notable construements that although officially rejected by the king, was discovered to have been subtly re-inserted and retained without his permission or knowledge, in the work submitted to the printer, was that of "church" in the sted of "congregation", and although contrary to the original language definition of "ecclesia", , was preferred by thu predominance of religious organizations of that era, and for the purpose of attempting to create, in defiance of Rev.22:18-19, assumed  Bible record authenticity of the religious establishment referred to thereby, and similarly with "presbyteros" being abandoned for "elder", instead of the orijinal definition of "priest", , and the subtle insertion of these and a few other contrary construements, having been accomplished by Thomas More, under pressure from the religious establishment of that era, and without which translational malignment, thu reformation could not hav occurred, and for thu reazon that in absense of such as "elder", there is no religious organization structural footing for the insertion of either bishop or archbishop, , and by substituting "church" in place of "ecclesia", absence of the original record of intent, seemingly allowed permission where originally it didn't exist, for the worship inclusion of a religious organization that insted uv proclaiming that which was Providentially established by The Tearing Of The Temple Veil, <-LINK over-ruled and abandoned the explicitly documented intent of that Holy record, , with one of profanely fabricated origin, and thereby, adding end-time stipulative credence to the command of 2Cor.6:17 to come OUT of and separate from and permanently abandon all heathen association, to be received by God. Obversely, NOT having done so, reveals that all such have NOT been received by God, Whom underlines that dictate even further when stating He neither dwells in man-made temples, nor sent or called any of they whom officiate therein, and in turn, this historically recorded reality revealing with conclusive clarity, the subjects of Mat.24:5, but again, as he whom was wounded unto death and yet survived, when H.W. Armstrong asked him if he was aware of his prophesied identity, in humble honesty, Mr. Wajtyler blurted out, , "Somebody's gotta do the job!", , and that was the day when the beast of Revelation 13 permanently ensnared with prophesied cleverness, he whom refused to acknowledge the historically recorded purpose of The Tearing Of The Temple Veil, <-LINK, and with dignified subtlety, permanently garnered such spiritual respect from H.W.A., as to be addressed by him, as spiritual FATHER, and soon thereafter, the Armstrong empire crumbled, beginning with a loud flushing noise when its international wings were clipped so thoroughly, as to retain not even one Spiritual flight feather. "Wajtyler" is thu family name of he who profanely named himself John Paul, and "Mr. Flush-it" waz thu biziness name uv thu legally blind plumber on record az claiming he wanted to be recognized az having dun sumthing worthy uv acseptanse for relijus organizaeshun pass-over assembly that year, and thu telefone discourse recording uv hiz repeated apolojies for stating lies conserning me, iz with-held frum thu GTA servants uv satan profanely assooming control over my Spiritual destiny, becuz simultaneously, that Armstrong church blasphemusly rejected Messiah's Sacrifice, by proclaiming superior authority to denounce thru' Thu Veil worship. In uther wordz, in that case, until Thu Judgement, I prevented them opportoonity to cover previous lies with new liez, , and regardless, thu FACTS remain UN-changed.
 
     To clarify concloosivly, "ecclezia" iz accurately defined az "a body uv beleeverz", and or "Thu Spiritually collectiv group uv Messiah'z Disiplez", , "thu congregaeshun uv God" az He addressed at Sinai, , and most certainly NOT thu relijus organizaeshun church establishment that didn't even exist at thu time The ingredients uv eventual Bible compozishun were being written by Thu Holy Apostlez and Profets scribez thereuv.
 
     King James' instructions spoke to the maintenance of factual continuity, and in such manner as public reading thereof, would accommodate comprehension by the prospective audience of that era, whether a householder, a butcher, or a plow-boy, , and without any alteration that would detract from the original context, it was his personally authored stipulation that the completed work reflect the obviety of having been translated via The Source "Spirit" thereof, to maintain congruency with The Original Foundation of God's LAW, and this was King James’ perpetual requirement for the dictate of tranzlaeshunl justice, by it revealing that tranzgreshun requirez thu pardoning uv sin, by Grace, so that Grace <-LINK can be seen as illuminating justice and justice promoting Grace, and he couldn't hav been sufficiently cognizant to make such foundational remarks requirements, except he BE a stalwart, 2Timothy 2:15 person himself, and this simple reality reveals his Matthew 10:22 compliant, life-style testimony and it's obvious thus, why the historical record so often states he was hated.
 
     King James' record reveals a reputational obsession for reconciliation, agreement, and unity, , and his assemblage of translators was required to function in orderly coherence and mutual respect thus, as his eighth and nineth instructions reveal via the context thereof dictating that each man of each company, was to translate each chapter, section, or book as directed thus, and having translated and or amended in accordance with the director's instructions, was then required to submit his work for a group conference of mutual agreement opinion to be established and concluded, as pertained to the translation accomplishment being precise, , and the mutually agreed best of these, then was to be accepted for judicious group inspection, discussion, editing, and resultant approval, because King James demanded exacting carefulness of scrutiny, and that ingredient of his character, resulted in him being much hated by the majority of that era, as the records confirm AND as is the case since Eden, or Abel would never have been murdered.
 
          Under The King's instructions, after emerging from the first general meeting of the translation process, that which was to become The King James Bible, had endyured no less than four, complete, translational smelterings, and all of the historical volumes perused, contain the open admittance that Tyndale’s work remains nearly 100% prominent in the AuKJV, and that Tyndale is the un-contested hero of the English Bible, despite the work of various governments to obliterate the memory of the man to whom, the existence of every English Bible is entirely indebted, however corrupt the off-shoot translations prove themselves to be when even marginally compared with Tyndale’s original work, the AuKJV Bible that commonly is known to be a factually, 94% duplication of Tyndale’s work, and an additional four percent unanimously agreed to contain at least the context of Tyndale’s original work, and only the remaining two percent having been edited sufficiently as to not retain appearance  of being Tyndale’s original work, and obviously because of the saboteur's malignments thereof, but regardless of King James' elaborately scrutinous attention to detail, that which occurred immediately preceding the printer's receival of it for typesetting, appears to be the only probable cause for the mere two percent discrepancy that the maligners thereof, hadn't the presence of mind to cover their irrevocable reward therefore, by simultaneous removal of Rev.22:18-19 that so emphatically reveals their conclusive destiny.
 
               Such phraseology as, Thy will be done, as in Heaven, so on earth, howbeit, peradventure, aforetime, holden, sojourn, and behooved, are 19th century expressions that enhance the readability of the AuKJV and thus, provide a grammatical template on which those profoundly attractive utterances of that day were structured, for the promotion of timelessly applicable, positive application of prescriptive literacy from the cradle to the grave, because of the potential thought perspectives they generate toward the openness of realities that now are treasured qualities to all nationalities, wherein the ancient enhances the present with the timeless nostalgia of the primitive.
 
     Thus, as the various translational smelterings confirm, the complete English translation was by Tyndale, in 1526, from the most scholarly sources available at that time, and as has not been repeated since. The Thomas Cromwell Bible in 1539, is a construed and thus a profane, mere “adaptaeshun” uv Tyndale'z work, and similarly with the bishop's bible in 1557 and the Geneva bible in 1560, and ALL of the other so-called bibles that have been edited out of that King James orijinal translaeshun by Tyndale, whether the Scofield, the New English, or the most recent Engelbrite supplanter bible that its duplication trespass of name by retaining the same initials, warrants that justly due judgement thereuv, becuz its author'z conduct, obveusly waz by nun uther than premeditated intent, NOT mere co-insidense, in addition to thu cold, hard fact of there being NO in-context profetical direction or least mention thus, NOR is there published confirmation from Engelbrite, that he's an Elect Member Of Thu Family Of God and thus, he's further revealed as NOT having had authority to the least meddle with an Holy Work of God, while in absence thus, and it's impossible for any after-the-fact change of heart or public apology, to the least correct his dastardly deed thus.
 
            In openly admitted fact by every historical work consulted, the AuKJV was an impossibility without Tyndale’s original 1526 Roman Calendar year translation, from which, the greater majority of the now globally common phraseology thereof, has become an historically entrenched and permanently established fact of reality for all time, and without exception thus. As a typical example, note Tyndale’s translation of The Last Supper, his shaping of the English language by the many phrases he coined to more readily accommodate obviously originally intended meaning, such as, , love suffereth long and is courteous; love envieth not; when I was a child, I spake as a child, I imagined as a child; eat, drink, and be merry; the salt of the earth; the powers that be; as bald as a coot; our Father which art in Heaven; etc., etc., and to the extent that repeatedly, Tyndale’s 1526 translation is professionally described as "the epitomy uv dignified simplicity", , and that remark totally annuls any least opinion of Tyndale’z work being difficult to comprehend or understand, although az of our present Roman calendar days of the late nineteen hundreds and forward therefrom, our language culturing has changed so very much, that it has become notably MUCH easier to read the 1769 edition of Tyndale's work, and the explanation a little further down herein, details the actual WHY . . . . . . . . . .

    The AuKJV Bible is recognized by scholars globally, as being the only translation that contains throughout, a Providentially Orchestrated Tradition of Divine intelligence, beauty, and clarity of statement, , and an intensity of perspective that exudes such quality of Providential Majesty as is un-matched by ANY officially published RE-translation of Tyndale’s original work or whutever part thereof, and thus, it is confirmed thereby, that except from within the pages thereof, it is thereby prophesied to occur as an -in- context, direct Act Of God, all uther attempts of translation, are an obveus trespass of An Holy Work and thus, except by Providenshally stated, IN-context order thus, ANY RE-translaeshun uv Tyndale'z orijinal work, IS thereby, confirmed profane. Similarly az human governments deem unofficial rendering uv their documents, an illegal offense punishable by law, all un-official rendering uv thu documents uv God'z Government, in addishun to being an illegal offense punishable by law, renderz thu guilty subject to thu prophesied destiny in Revelaeshun 22:18-19. 
 
     Thu rezultant work uv thu translatorz, is spoken of by wun historian, as being a bureaucratic kind of Holyness, in that more than exhibiting blatant signs of obvious inspiration, the AuKJV resulted from precisely exacting judicial efficiency and resolute carefulness. As an example thereof, a remaining, original manuscript of the era and process, on file in the Lambeth Palace Library established thus by Richard Bancroft in 1610, is the original English translation of apostle paul's letters, with each page thereof, manually ruled out in red ink, with double columns and a margin on left and right, with only the left column and margin used throughout, and the right column and margin remaining blank, and except for only two instances, the entirety of the text is in the cursive, secretarial manner of that 15th, 16th, and 17th century era of Tyndale’s work, this confirming by actual fact of historical document reality proof, , that although in fact it is a professional translator's ledger, it does appear to be so conclusively evident thus as to reveal thereby, the intended purpose of legitimacy of passionate inspiration of the original manuscript that in brief perusal, appears more as an Angel's accounting document, than a literary accomplishment, and this record specifically, having been prepared by the 2nd Westminster translation group, under the direction of William Barlow, prior to criticism scrutiny circulation through the other groups, as is evidenced by the addition of previously missing words, symbols, corrected spelling and punctuation, while yet retaining the appearance of carefully studious dedication, because, , the translators’ major goal and priority throughout  the translation process, was that of contextual accuracy as obviously was accomplished in that 17th century work, despite the often laboriously confusing realities of very different cultural and societal applications of the common language of that era.
. . . . . . . . . . 
     For example, in 1611, LET was defined as hinder or prevent, insted uv to permit or allow, and PREVENT was defined as prior or preceding. Other such definition obstacles encountered during the translation process, included these herein following, that even yet in some areas of England, that although most presently English speaking are at least familiar with the "V" inclusion in some such, also, they're aware of the original pronunciation that is without a "V" sound.
. . . . . . . . . . 
     Demaunde-demand; torned-torn; hartily-heartily; neyther-neither; euery-every; riuer-river; coolenesse-coolness; loue-love; couered-covered; iealousie-jealousy; graue-grave; yong-young; shalbe-shall be; idolatrie-idolatry; sauior-saviour; euerie one-every one; comynge-coming; kysse-kiss; hymself-himself; kyndnes-kindness; chayre-chair; breade-bread; wyne-wine; som-some; cleane-clean; pryvat-private; spyrit-spirit; receiue-receive; sonnes-sons; Almightie-Almighty; doe-do; howse-house; toppe-top; necessarie-necessary
. . . . . . . . . .
    The original collection of these was notably larger until some were permanently lost from my records, when the Billy Gates computer software spell checker assumed the false authority of correcting all such that it contained within its program, but, , that which remains is sufficient to communicate the intended message.
. . . . . . . . . .

Whether the 1611 or any of the four, later revisions thereof, the 1629, 1638, 1762 and 1769 are identical in context, but with increasing content improvements in spelling and phrazeology and thereto, the 1769 edition iz the most eazily readable becuz uv being that which now, is known as The Authorized, King James Version, AuKJV.
. . . . . . . . . .
     Concerning the very common problem of attempting to discern the correctly intended meaning in various areas throughout the 1611 version firstly, becuz of its English expressions NOT being textually common with today's manner of speaking, and for the majority that are attempting an understanding in absence of the required Ps.111:10 key therefore, such difficulty could in fact be monumental, although a little less so with the 1629 and 1638 versions and much less so with the 1762 and 1769 editions, , and for the reason that each of these is a revision of the previous, and although all such inclood only the grammar and not the context, in uther words, only HOW whatever is said and not WHAT is said, the 1769 end result difference thus, is especially pleasing, in that nearly ALL of the typographical and most other grammar concerned errors are removed therefrom. Thus, it may prove helpful to note that attempting to obtain an original 1611 version, may NOT be as helpful as hoped to be, in that it has all of the original grammar problems that most of which, are because of the FONT/TYPESTYLE/TYPEFACE used throughout therein, because of such differences as non-standardized spelling that continued until the eighteenth century, and in the instance of the 1611 version specifically, reading is extremely arduous the first time through, for even a scholarly experienced person, and the reazon being simple, in that because a Germanic Font was used to print it, a common English "f" is in the place of all intended to be an "s", , a "v" in all places of an English "u" and a "j" in all places intended to have an "i", and these being only some such and not all of the differences that were introduced by the use of the Germanic Font. Note also, that it wouldn't be difficult to have such result thus, if the printer had nun uther font available and wazn't desirous of purchasing anything different, and that assuming that the thought of such had actually been discussed, because prior to the computer age of only the last fifty or so years, FONT selection presented quite a problem to most people wanting something printed, in that most people weren't the least aware of the monumental differences that could result and in most cases, didn't want to learn of such, when their only purpose was to accomplish the printing process, without the bothersome task of telling the printer how to do it. Font - a specific kind or manufacturer's brand uv alfanumeric symbolz that comprize a complete set uv all alfabet/alphabet and number symbolz contained therein, such az/as, thu font/typestyle set used/yoozed throout herein that haz thu copyright brand name uv Verdana: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz-, ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ;
STUVWXYZ;1234567890.!?@#$%^&*()_+=<>[]  This wun iz called COURIER.

A maligned FONT iz wun such that containz foreign, fake, fraudulent, and or non-authentic symbol/z, such az thu copyright brand name uv Times New Roman Font that substitoots thu lower-case "g" symbol thereuv, with thu Greek Symbol for 1 billyun that commonly iz known az a "gigi", az in "gigi-byte" referense uv compyooter terminology, and appearz as "g". Although my personal research on this negative reality, iz limited, it trasez back to thu mid or late 1940'z when the inventor uv an entirely new font, inserted thu "gigi" "g" symbol, seemingly to distinguish his font frum all utherz, and like az all uther demonically inserted introozyunz, it's becume globally adopted az a legitimate substitoot, even thoh it's NOT. A less critical Font malignment is that of thu Verdana Font containing a falsely formed upper-case "Q" symbol that appears as thu rear of a headless cat, and falsely replaces the original "Q". Further note that in historically confirmed fact, NUN of the alphanumeric ingredients are correctly defined or spoken of az LETTERZ, that insted, are thu rezults uv yoozing thu symbolz to form wordz that then are yoozed to write letterz or whutever uther documents. Also, alphanumeric iz correctly defined az referring to whutever combinaeshun uv alfabet and number symbolz and addishunally, thu "fonetic correcshun" insershun uv spesific langwaje pronunseaeshun transliteraeshun depicting symbolz, iz known az Heritaje English, and samples uv such are - fonetic in plase uv phonetic, uv in place uv of, uzed or yoozed in place of used, thu in plase uv the, rezults in plase uv results, etc., becuz such simple change correctly denotes thu common pronunciaeshun thus, , az also iz revealed with thu substitooshun uv becuz in plase uv because, and substitooshun in plase uv substitution, thus very much aiding thu reading ability uv thu nearly half uv all Canadianz whooz government haz confirmed by stat's, are illiterate, and this having rezulted frum Canadian legislaeshun that renderz it illegal to compel any stoodent to comply with whutever learning absorpshun standard, to be eligible for advansement to thu next grade level. Az uv June, 2011, Manitoba'z premier announced that henceforth, all primary-school instrucshun shall be acomplished via "gamez", insted uv the actually studious absorpshun manner that rezults in educaeshunaly qualified stoodents at year-end.   
 
     Althoh thu king's pre-established amount uv compensaeshun per translator, was adamantly and persistently refyoozed, thu task progressed with Richard Bancroft's judicious guidance, so that the king's instruction to the translators, would follow strict translation procedures under the watchful eye of Mr.Bancroft, the king's over-seer appointee whom often acquired Royal approval of translation results, and this was intended to minimize the risk of producing a bible containing obvious religious sector favor, whether puritanism, calvanism, or catholicism, as so obviously waz immacyoolately acomplished, even though az myself, William Tyndale waz reared staunch catholic.

Thus, King James intent was so successfully conclooded, as to sufficiently offend the puritans, calvanists, and the catholics, and to the extent of they composing their OWN bibles, and as Mr. Englebrite followed the profane example of, in totally intentional ignorance of the warning in Rev.22:18-19, and the simple reality that in fact, it's impossible for there to be more than one/wun, orijinal, Providentially inspired, Holy Bible, and this simple reality rendering all uther "published" work thus than The AuKJV, profanely compozed substitutes.
 
     1-Thu foremost translation rule dictated that no context be altered beyond that required for a totally comprehensive rendering, while yet remaining subject to retention of thu same Godly dictate of standards, principles, and Troothz. 2-All Holy Writers and associated names within the text, must be retained, and subject to only the absoloote minimum of translaeshun vulgarity incloozyun, az sumetimez translaeshun rezults in. 3-Orijinality of all eclesiastical referensez must be retained, such as church NOT being rendered congregation, becuz althoh it's Biblically obveus that Thu Congregation Of God, in Bible confirmed fact, is that which comprises The Elect Church Of The First Born, , the obverse substitooshun uv church in plase uv congregaeshun, iz NOT Biblically substantiated, becuz in fact, thu many and various churches of this end time, do NOT in the least, constitute The Congregation of God, else Mat.24:5 would never have been written. Granted, prior to and after the first six, symbolic days of trial and testing testimony book writing, that reazoning wouldn't apply, becuz uv total absense uv satan'z counterfeit church. For thu person questioning whut "translation vulgarity" amounts to, an extreme example is blatantly communicated in the fact that when a child, my parents intentionally, totally dis-associated from a new Canadian, because of his family name being "Lipshit", , but jovially retained association with another whose name was "Spitzkey", , and for the obvious reazons of not desiring to pronounce the one name, while reckoning the other merely comical.  In fact, I recall the original instance when my dad was introducing Mr. Spitzkey to Scotsman neighbor, Mr. Tom Doer, and because of the obviously noted silent grin on Tom's face immediately thereafter, my dad asked, "Did you GET that Tom?", , and to which, chuckling, Mr. Doer replied, "I got the SPIT but not the KEY!"  Sometime a few months later, community gossip communicated that because of not feeling welcome, Mr. Lipshit eventually learned of the reazon and changed the negative suffix part of his name to "shae" (Lipshae) and then re-settled in a different part of the nation. Although in his native nation, the co-incidental English verb "shit", very probably was never known, , in Canada back in those days, most rural folk didn't welcome such translation vulgarity as made direct reference to intestinally excreting.  (response thus published 17d11m09y)(It would seem that a second response is needed now, to clarify to ALL readers, that in fact I do NOT approve of our present society's adaptation of linguistically expressing themselves, by so repeatedly often during conversation, substitutionally inserting the vulgar expression SHIT that is direct reference to intestinally excreting. To explain, our most helpful neighbors describe at least half of everything they speak of, as being "shit", and although that's much preferred to blasphemy, the simple fact remains that it is NOT the least sanely necessary to so demonically construe any language, as to so commonly refer to virtually everything being discussed or referred to, as "shit". NO! This statement is NOT a falsehood. When my most friendly neighbors intend to go shopping, quite commonly they'll state, "We must go into town to pickup more shit.", , or if something is wrong with their vehicle, they may say, "It's got some shit in it.", , or when cleaning out the bottom of their lawnmower, they'll describe the grass clippings collection as "shit". Additionally, the commonly familiar expression that now is well known as the "F" word, is equally as prominent or more so in the common language of the day in this nation and in some parts, such as Newfoundland, because the majority there are virtually unschooled and have such a small vocabulary, in FACT, if they didn't often and repeatedly insert the excretion word and the "F" word when attempting to make a statement, they'd be unable to speak, because of their extremely limited vocabulary compelling them to often and regularly insert whatever grammatical vulgarity that in their opinion, may suffice to communicate their intended message, , and so ingrained is this mental problem societally, that it's common for their toddlers to be cultured thus and to such extent, that a properly educated person can NOT be adequately understood by ANY age of Newfoundlander, except there be repeated statements of attempting to explain what's intended to be said, BUT, , getting back to the inquiry, be it known by all readers hereof, that in fact, although my OWN personal speech may be normally punctuated with totally clean Scottish expressions because of not being that far removed ancestrally from The Scottish Highlands where my gramps was math professor at Edinburgh University, my presence in this community is NEITHER desired nor welcomed, because of it being my common habit, to always make my vulgar neighbors aware of their profane and filthy mouths, and to the extent of permanently expelling one such and warning another. So, =NO=! I do =NOT= approve of nor the least accept or tolerate or even excuse obviously insane speaking habits, and to describe it otherwise, is not sufficient, because no one in their right mind, assuming they may have such, would intentionally punctuate a sentence so insanely as to have virtually HALF of the words, consisting either of the "F" word RAPE expression or that of intestinally excreting, and more often than not, BOTH of such. Speaking directly to the "F" word factual definition, it duz NOT correctly apply in any given instance of sexual intercourse penetration, except that of RAPE, and RAPE being accurately defined as UN-desired, FORCED entry that also includes the definition of personal intrusion trespass that in earlier days, consistently waz punishable by deth, becuz it permanently steals frum, mars and scars the innocent victim. This response inserted 15d01m2010.)

     Two notably critical errors in the resultantly printed work that had been submitted to the printer AFTER being further edited by the sabotager, in absence of King James' prior knowledge, are within the few such assumed to have been the reason for the total razing of the print shop, promptly following the first printing and distribution thereof, and for the obvious purpose of obliterating all records of that which was submitted, because otherwise the altered references wouldn't agree with the duplicates retained by the other translators, but, , because  the fire removed all proof of what had been submited for printing, it then could be asserted as having been a possible typesetting error that ought never be altered or changed, because each such instance is deemed to concern a doctrinal matter that would require consent of all of the original translators, most of whom by then had departed the area and were not readily available to be re-assembled for group discussion and mutual concession that in fact, the changes that appeared to have self-occurred, between the time of conclusive agreement on the work, and its arrival at the printers, were not  in fact, in  the remaining duplicate works of the other translators. Clearly, the appointed task of responsibility for submission, is the only obvious area of original text alteration guilt, but, with that part of the record missing, there was NO potential for on-going, argumentative disagreement amongst the few dozen translation scholars, because nun would be desirus of supporting negative judgement and most would concede as normal, that a minor such result could occur amongst so many groups that worked apart and came together by appointment only, to compare results and thus, 2Tim.2:15 is The Providenshaly required dictate to isolate, reject and bridge-over the so very few non-congruent negativ constrooments.
 
     Thus, the so-called church of England, appearz  to hav sucseeded in its attempt to negatively construe to whatever minor degree, thu preveusly perfect work uv thu translatorz, but whether with or without Richard Bancroft's prior knowledge or approval, shall not be known by those of us that remain, until the judgement. Wun thing for sertain, iz that The Authorized King James Bible is as different as white compared to black, from that of the catholic version that the Roman church translation construed so thoroughly from it, as to even contain different commandments and the replacement of God The Father, with the un-resurrected Roman leader as spiritual father, although quite understandably because in fact, Rev.13 confirms he is the negative father spirit that God changed the name of, from Lucifer to satan, the first transgressor and father of deception, and from out of whom, all Bible declared heathen religion has originated, including orthodox and all of its protesting daughters sects. To understand the historical reality of all human life containing originally created, Heaven resident spirit entities whom in Bible confirmed fact, are flesh-embodied angels on trial and testing pilgrimage to confirm via trial and testing testimony book writing, whom they're allied with, so they can be justly blessed or cursed by the contents of their own, personally authored testimony book, , perooz this link:
 
      Although this additional incloozyun of re-search excerpts had been scheduled for insershun for approximately two years during the last part of my Daniel 9:27 pilgrimage, it's only this early morning of Roman Calendar February 07, 2008, that I conclooded I could afford to miss more sleep, to accomplish this four hours task that required I first glean from my research filez, all of thu pertinently relativ informaeshun, and then edit it for directly applicable facts, before combining and formatting thu rezult for its insershun here, at nearly three A.M., and in advanse, I do sincerely THANK thoze readerz that comyoonicate such extent uv appresheaeshun of my extensive work, as to send tokens thereof, via the inquiries and donations page of this website.

     Because the matter at hand concerns such immeasurable importance as Eternal Life, as opposed to hell-fire damnation, , it's not difficult to see why nun other than The Royally and Scientifically confirmed book of historical facts that The AuKJV Bible is, remains the version preferred by Bible teachers and scholars globally, and even more so, when acseptanse uv any uther, confirms condonement of profanely altered content that  simultaneously thereby, renders the users thereof, defiant of the warning in Revelation 22:18-19 and Romans 5:12 and thus, required to reply commendably, as to why they choze and thereby, condoned and promoted a maligned and distorted record, insted of the original Providentially provided for them, , and because of that one, simple, defiant act of disrespect for the fact that God's Elect are required to be an Holy Assembly, without spiritually negative spot or wrinkle, an utherwise pure hearted soul could be instantly rejected from among the symbolic sheep, and directed to join with the symbolic goats.