1Timothy 2:5  , , thair iz wun God, and wun medeaetor between God and men, Thu Man, Christ Thu Messiah;

Revelation 22:14 Blessed are they that DO Hiz commandments, that they may hav right to Thu Tree uv Eternal Life, and may enter in, throo Thu Gates, into Thu Holy City Uv God.

Romans 2:13 , , not thu hearerz uv Thu LAW are just before God, but, , thu doerz uv Thu LAW shall be justified.

Also, to be a female spouse, while simultaneusly profesing Bible confirmed  CHRISTIANITY , requirez first that yoo acknowledje yor Eden apointed Lord and Master, while not forgeting that in such instanse, uh "throoh-Thu-Vail" worship asoseashun yet iz required uv yoo, 24/7, and also, , if yoo hav or hav had, more than wun bed mate, or hav returned to a preveus bed mate, without Bible stated permishun to do so, Thu Bible labelz yoo a whore and abominable before God, until yoo repent thairuv by imeedeately total disasoeseashun frum ALL men, until yor deth, and whutever children are involved thairby, are Bible confirmed subject to thair Dad’z dictate, az to whether they are to remain with him, or go permanently to liv’ with thair muther until uv legal aje, and during which time, whutever vizitaeshun rights shall not thu least involve thu muther speaking directly to a preveus bed mate or the estranjed children, lest her repentanse requirement thus be trespased and she be no more subject to God’z Mersy, becuz permiting vizitaeshun or cumyoonicaeshun rights that are not Bible confirmed in such instanse, renderz extreemly thin, whutever remaining thred uv available Mersy. To re-state for total clarity, if thu Dad keeps thu children with him, that iz thu case until they are uv legal aje, but if he lets thu muther keep them, they are with her until uv legal aje, and in total, undispyooted and uncontested absense uv thu least comyoonicaeshun until uv legal aje, becuz inculcaeshun uv manz’ lawz, could rezult in damnaeshun, by providing repeat frequensy uv nesesity to cumyoonicate with a preveus bed mate that during which time, even a memorably congenial remark uv a preveus expeareense, could be interpreted az revealing thu separaeshun at least marjinaly disdained, and that would render thu repentanse "flawed" and simultaneusly, God’z Mersy withdrawn, and without recorse. If yoo are NOT more dezirus for Eternal Life, than for thu least asoseashun or comyoonicaeshun with a preveus bed mate that rendered yoo a whore in God'z eyez, then obveusly, yor repentanse iz not total and thus, yoo are not elijible for Messiah'z Sacrifise in yor sted, and if separaeshun frum whutever children, pullz at yor hart stringz more than the availability uv Eternal Life, then obveusly, yor Eternal Destiny iz teetering in thu balans. Yes; it iz dificult for thu woman BUT, , it waz SHE that waz taken OUT uv man, NOT utherwize and thus, having perswaded her huzband into desepshun that rezulted in thu deth penalty for all, it iz understandable that thu woman iz expeareensing a dificult time uv it, but had Adam refyoozed her perswaesiv atempts to trespas God'z Will, thu prezent rezult would be that ownly thu woman iz subject to deth, and becuz that would not hav jeopardized God'z Plan, thair'd hav been no Sacrifise to redeem her, and in thu meantime, Adam would hav eaten uv Thu Tree Uv Eternal Life, and whenever hiz woman became old and died, he'd chooze anuther, becuz then ownly thu malez would hav and retain Eternal Life, but, , thu prezent Eternal Life Salvaeshun program compensates by again permiting all to chooze thair preferens uv iether Eternal Life, or hell fire damnaeshun, , and althoh it seemz entirely insane that anywun would prefer a horible deth and everlasting punishment, to that uv Eternally blissful LIFE, thu recordz uv history and even thoze uv thu prezent, confirm beyond a doubt, that in fact, most people prefer deth and damnaeshun, to that uv deth and rezurecshun to Eternal Life.

Also, if in absense uv Bible confirmed lejitimate separaeshun frum a preveus mate, yoo hav or have had, more than wun sexyooaly involved person, Thu Bible labelz yoo a whore and abominable before God, until yoo repent thairuv by imedeately total disasoeseashun frum all men and remaining thus until yor deth OR thu deth uv all preveus sexyooal involvment personz, but obveusly, if yoo've memory uv repeatedly having been rendered ded-drunk az thu saying goez, and in that state, were passed-around nood to whutever waiting malez, such az yor prezent huzband most probably wouldn't be aware uv hiz wife's history thus, , while continyooing with thu mairaje yoonyun that would be Bible labelled abominable, , most sertainly yoo'd not know when all preveus sex contacts are ded, BUT, "if" in totally open honesty, yoo informed yor virjin huzband-to-be UV yor preveus sexual relaeshunz promiscyooity, and he acsepted yoo regardless uv that reality, then, for az long az yoo remain chaste thairafter az HIZ woman, it could be an instanse very similar to that uv John 8:3-11, and probably judjed acordingly, BUT, , if thu chaste factor hazn't becum a reality until reading this, , yor huzband iz dezerving uv an imeedeate, totally private seshun uv open confeshun, and AFTER which, if he'z manajed to contain himself, yoo'll be required iether to leave, OR be permited to stay, and whether with or without bedroom incloozyun, iz entirely HIZ desizyun, althoh no mater whut man'z law states, if he requirez that yoo leave, he haz every right to state that yoo may depart, but with nuthing more than yoo can wear and/or carry, , becuz history confirmz it's thu female'z error that made all uv this nesessary and thus, she whom iz UN-faithful, iz very BLESSED to be permited to merely depart in less than twenty-four hourz, with nuthing more than that which she can wear or carry, and if permited to depart, but ownly if done so imedeately, that ALSO must be considered a BLESSING by thu woman, becuz in Bible times, thu woman would be publicly shamed and stoned to deth, and althoh God hazn't chanjed that prior rooling, prezent day sosiety'z lawz in most naeshunz, prevent thu cheated huzband frum taking hiz whore'z life but regardless, it's MUCH more honorable in God'z eyez, if thu cheated huzband asists hiz whore in finding uther acomudaeshun, and incloodz thu first and last month's rent and a jenerus amount uv pocket money, but with thu conclooosiv understanding that her return or fyootyure contact, may be delt with much diferently, and if he'z wize, he'll be shure to hav a witnes for all that transpires thus and preferably, begin with the instrucshun uv hiz whore'z choise uv law offis, while also aware that in North America, thair ARE sityooaeshunz that could compel him to permit hiz whore to stay, thus imedeately obligating HIM to divide hiz living quarterz in a manner that permits an aseptable two dwellingz aranjement that in most casez, proovz very negativ for him, if he can't aford to abandon such sircumstansez, becuz in North America/Canada whair whoredom uv iether gender iz so prevalent, thu chaste mairaje partner iz very much no les than frowned-upon by thu corts, even in thu case uv a muther-son relaeshunship, whair thu muther and son atempt to conseal thair closenes, by fabricating false informaeshun acyoozaeshunz, even if ownly insinyooaeshunal, against a Godly, totally chaste father-daughter relaeshunship.

*Thu resent inquiry for Bible stated permishun to divorse, becuz uv thu wife's asoomed inability to prodoos children, , haz NO Bible basis permishun; note that becuz divorse haz NO Bible substansheated basis thus, ecsept via speshal sircumstanse that I haven't the authority to publish, becuz too many would take unfair advantaje thus, and althoh thair are Bible examplez uv how to cope with such reality, each spesific instanse requirez spesific Bible referense instrucshun that obveusly, requirez that the inquiry person be willing to provide aplicable informaeshun conserning hiz/her sircumstansez that in ABSENSE uv, it's imposible to provide thu respectiv Direct Quote Bible Answers for. Az an example uv whut this mater amounts to in thu greater majority uv casez, the inquiry preveus to this, waz frum a woman seeking Bible stated permishun to divorse becuz uv having resently met thu man uv her dreemz, , in adishun to refyoozing to acsept thu reality uv thair being NO Bible permishun for a wife's inisheaeshun uv divorse, when repeatedly she refyoozed to state WHETHER she'd ever LAIN with that man uv her dreamz, prior to her huzband having divorsed her, which he had NOT, , I refyoosed to counsel her further, and encoraje ALL would-be contacts thus, to NOT request MY Bible Knowledje asistanse, if it's yor intent to merely acquire Bible permishun condonement uv NON-Biblical conduct. It's MY oepinyun, that less than wun persent uv thoze reading this, would hav dificulty diserning acyurately, fairly, and justly within themselvez, "WHETHER" thair marital conduct iz or haz been acseptable to God, and for that reazon, I do "NOT" comonly welcum oportoonity to counsel anywun that haz a dezire to obtain Bible permishun for a divorse, and more-so when EVERY instanse to date, haz rezulted in total disss-satisfacshun becuz "I" refyooz to claim authority in God'z plase, to state WHETHER whomever MAY or may NOT hav MY permishun to DIVORCE whomever. If thu readerz hereuv are NOT dezirus uv acsepting thu simple responsibility uv interpreting for them SELVES, =WHETHER= Thu comprehensiv Bible Quotes I provide, aply in whutever maner to THAIR spesific case, thair iz NO benefit whut-so-ever in requesting my help. To provide Bible context maligning excyoozal for whutever conduct, iz NOT my least dezire, , and when excyoozal involvez contemptyool purpose or dezire, it should be spelled that way that in Canada, whair az uv a decade ago, 48% of thu rezidents were illiterate, it's refered to az Heritaje English, when wordz are SPELED az pronounsed, that in thu profeshunal world uv langwaje parsing, iz corectly refered to az tranzliteraeshun.

Up-Date uv 23d06m2011, , ,

      To thu three letterz reseived 23d06m2011, conserning 1-uh muther-in-law benefit or detriment, 2-female spouzal obligaeshun to submit in all thingz and confirm depth uv submishun, by humbly unhezitant wilingnes to chanje and adapt to whutever new and or utherwize diferent condishunz, sircumstansez, standardz, prinsiplez, or actyooal lifestyle, 3-and thu comunly suden disapearanse uv virtually all intimasee expreshunz in thu male spousez conduct that prior to mairaje, were so prevalent az to hav convinsed thu prospectiv female spouse, that it waz her prospectiv mate's permanent state uv character conduct toward her, , in that order:

       1-Regardles uv whether thu male or female spouse iz the objector, any least, UN-wanted family or UTHER interfearense, whether welcumed or merely tolerated by EITHER spouse, , exsept BOTH partnerz welcum and or no less than tolerate it equally, constitoots no less than uh major breech uv thu marriage agreement in EVERY case that duzn't inclood more than thu male and female mairaje partnerz, and whair any such duzn't involve BOTH genderz, any would-be mairaje iz so jenyooinly demonic az to be thoroghly abominable, BUT, to clarify without atenshun to hyooman swine character involvement, stating it diferently, exsept whutever family member in adishun to thu mairaje couple, iz named thairin, az uh dezired incloosiv ingredeent part uv thu mairaje agreement, , tolerating any such interfearense, insted uv honoring thu mairaje contract agreement that's abominable if not inclooding OWNLY thu respectiv mairaje couple named thairin, in fact, renderz that kind uv mairaje null and void uv any least mezyur uv binding significanse, for thu foundaeshunal reazon uv thu mairaje contract naming ownly thu bride and groom az subjects thairuv and thus, thu least toleraeshun uv whomever else, obveusly constitoots no less than such major infracshun uv the agreement, az to constitoot an acomplished divorse thairby, even if never rejistered via whutever cort and thairfore, a female spouse heeding thu least uv whutever non-contractyooal voise, whether muther-in-law or whomever else, and repeatedly refyoozing to corect her conduct thus, renderz divorse the ownly viable recorse for thu male spouse, althoh similar sircumstansez involving input frum thu huzband'z side, iz NOT thu least recorse for a wife to claim permishun for divorse on, ecsept she can provide actyooal proof uv her huzband'z on-going failyur to adequately provide for her, that being the OWNLY Bible provizyun for a woman to claim permishun for divorse. Ex.21:10 - If he take anuther wife, he must proov himself capable uv providing adequately for both hiz prezent AND hiz new wife. OCVV Althoh this iz direct referense to aprooval for a secund wife, that thu Canadian Government's Freedum-Uv-Relijun lejislaeshun must condone, it containz more than sufishent inferense that a huzband'z dooty incloodz thu providing uv FOOD, CLOTHING, and sumthing cumendably interesting to do, that directly, iz related to and comunly involvez mairaje responsibiliteez that if NOT prezent, renderz thu neglijent huzband guilty on all 3 counts, in that failyur to provide all requirements, renderz him guilty uv NOT providing ALL such.  Verse 11 confirmz that all legal and uther expensez uv any such instanse, are and remain thu huzband'z finanshal burden. Ex.21:11 - If he do not theze three unto her, then she shall (MAY or thus HAZ PERMISHUN to) depart without payment for her freedom thus. OCVV The AuKJV verzyun iz -Ex.21:10- If he take him anuther wife, her food, her raiment, and her dooty uv mairaje, he shall not diminish. 11 , , and if he do not theze three unto her, then she shall go out free, without money. (curensy cost) money.
         It must be noted that the expreshun, "FAILYUR TO PROVIDE", can be very unfairly and time-consooming laboreusly dificult if not imposible to confirm in this end-time sosietee, whairin it's uh comunly acsepted understanding that becuz uv thu near imposibility for wun person to earn sufishently for BOTH mairaje partnerz, az iz thu case in Canada where 33% incum tax iz uh comun detriment to mairaje stability, "FAILYUR for thu huzband TO PROVIDE", would entail extensively detailed confirmaeshun thus, EXSEPT PRIOR to mairaje, it iz understood by BOTH partnerz, that thu HUZBAND OWNLY would be and remain thu provider, but even then, under God, IF he deemz it expeedeent under extenyooating sircumstansez, to involve hiz woman in hiz PROVIDING dooteez, and she acsepts that partner dictate az an ingredeent factor uv marriaje partnership retenshun, that simple reality can NOT be yoozed az groundz for divorse, exsept for yearz, thu woman haz been uncomplainingly "making-do" with, while atempting to be happy when existing on the amount that thu huzband'z earningz OWNLY, are providing.  

         2-Female spouzal obligaeshun to submit in ALL thingz and confirm depth uv submishun, by humbly unhezitant wilingnes to chanje and adapt to whutever new and or utherwize diferent condishunz, sircumstansez, standardz, prinsiplez, or actyooal lifestyle, iz a MAJOR priority uv consern in EVERY mairaje contract/agreement. Granted, prezent-day comun-nes uv thu female spouse not hezitating to file for uh divorse, when failing to win thu first spousal argyooment, tendz to set a presedent sosietally BUT, sosietal presedents are NOT an incloozyun uv Thu Bible Sorse Mairaje Foundaeshun and thus, iether spouse atempting to perswade the uther on little or nuthing more than whutever sosietal standard and or presedent, iz very seldum if ever uh comendably viable basis uv argument settlement and or concloozyun. Frum a DIFFERENT perspectiv, , under God, any male spouse raizing ANY topic matter uv DIS-satisfacshun conserning hiz woman, while in ABSENSE uv multiple honorable witnessez to confirm that PRIOR to marriage, he had MORE than adequately informed hiz wife-to-be, whut the extent uv her submishun to him az her fyootyur huzband, would/could entail, iz introdoosing and encourajing basis for discord, becuz any marriage intended to be via Bible stipyoolated standardz, that involvez uh woman that's NOT been informed in advanse, , that Bible orijinated standardz require her to obey her huzband IN ALL THINGZ, nuthing exsepted, , simultaineusly renderz thu huzband at fault, and az "I" would interpret it personally frum MY understanding uv Scripture, obligates him to provide hiz thus UN-fairly acquired wife, with an offishally rejistered bill uv divorsement, that "if" acsepted by her, in turn, remainz in effect and acseptable under God, for az long thairafter az she remainz commendably chaste, and that requiring that until her deth, she not ever ugen hav uh mairaje partner, nor thu least maner uv sexyooal encounter with uh male person. In thu case uv NUN or ownly PARSHAL involvement with Bible standardz, virtually ANY conduct iz sosietally permisible, althoh YET shall be JUDJED by God, az if it WERE subject to Bible standardz, and for thu reazon that orijinally, mairaje waz institooted by God and thus, any conduct involving thu least uv UN-welcumed, private parts tuching uv the oposit gender, constitoots uh Biblical standardz infracshun, regardless uv whether thoze involved are aware, , similarly az when atempting to fabricate yor nation'z curensy, when uh little short uv cash, constitoots an illegality punishable by law, regardless uv whether yoo were aware uv that being illegal.
            "if" acsepted by her - NOTE, that if NOT acsepted by her, simultaineusly constitoots ACSEPTANSE uv thu sircumstansez that brought about thu prezentaeshun uv uh bill uv divorsement and thenseforth, she iz required to perform az if she HAD been dyootifully informed PRIOR to mairaje.
              az "I" would interpret it personaly frum MY understanding uv Scripture - NOTE, that becuz this spesific kind uv instanse iz NOT Biblically adressed in uh major maner, I've inclooded my personal notaeshun remark thus, being totaly aware that in-depth study uv respectiv referensez, would more than substansheate this statement.

          3-Thu comunly suden disapearanse uv virtually all intimasee expreshunz in thu male spousez conduct that prior to mairaje, were so prevalent az to hav convinsed thu prospectiv female spouse that it waz her prospectiv mate's on-goingly permanent state uv character conduct toward her, , iz and remainz uh critically seereus factor uv our end-time sosiety, confirming thus, that thu majority uv so-called mairajez today, frum thu huzband'z perspectiv, are simply for thu conveniense and finanshal benefit that brothelz don't provide. It duzn't require uh yooniversity degree nor thu least uv uh collej edyoocaeshun, to comprehend such simple reality az that uv jenyooin luv intimaseez and related expreshunz and conduct, being an UN-interupted, on-going maner uv normal character conduct in an honest hart. Granted, even yearz-long cortships can proov uh total waste uv preshus time; uh case in point, iz that uv uh man whom after keeping himself and uh much dezired woman, chaste, while living together until they could afford thair own house and new furnishingz, on arival home frum uh brief mairaje seremownee, waz suddenly hated by thu woman he'd so much prized az to keep her chaste for more than five yearz, when while yet in her wedding garments, looked straight into hiz eyez and sed, "Conserning thu schedyool for thu duzen children yoo wanted, ALL that haz chanjed, becuz now we're maireed. So, I'll permit yoo WUN child, TWO at most.", and becuz that yung man couldn't really beleeve hiz earz uv that instanse, aproximately twenty yearz later, hiz secretly kept diary contained unmistakably factual detail uv hiz woman having intenshunally aborted eleven uv hiz children, and that number would hav been uh duzen, had he not applied uh discreet method uv prezerving thu pregnansee uv whut became hiz only daughter to such woman that preferred to lock herself in with her convenient accounting servisez, nearly bald-heded boss, rather than provide due benevolense to uh nearly handsum man who'd rescued her frum uh sexyooally promiscuus home environment and houzed her for five yearz, and thu day before viziting thu minister schedyooled to perform thu mairaje for them, again fased her with thu fact that being an atractiv yung virgin, she waz welcum to chooz uh huzband uther than he, , but becuz she knew thu man she'd been living with, waz sufishently honorable az to also be controlable in sircumstansez that may mar hiz repyootashun utherwize, she refyoozed permishun to chooz uh diferent man or look elsewhere, but imedeately after thu sairemownee (ceremony) thu very next afternoon, prooved herself uh daughter uv satan, by sudenly reverting to thu kind uv person that obveusly she'd been, prior to him rescuing her frum thu traumatic home environment whair she'd overheard her dad tell her brutherz, that they were permitted intimate freedum with thair sisterz, so long az they didn't make them pregnant. So, being grosly cheated in mairaje, can oecur to iether gender, and with modern statistics available to all dezirus uv learning such facts, thair iz at least equally az much probability uv being cheated on iether side uv thu gender gap but, , for they whom are UN-able to liv with thair hormonal drivez, in uh sosiety that proliferates thu modern food chain with such, often it's imposible to convinse iether yung men or women to engulf themselvez in uh career, insted uv chansing uh contractyooal obligashun that in most casez, rezults in decadez uv mizerable UN-happiness and UN-wanted live or legaly murdered children, , and by MOST, I mean notably MORE than half, and that very probably amounting to at least seventy persent, and Biblical standardz DON'T permit mairaje trialz for thu purpus uv diserning WHICH 2 or 3 potenshalz out uv 110, may proov acseptable. This color uv green text near thu botum uv paje 185, may contain itemz uv relativ consern NOT inclooded hearin.